Brexit: May and Davis ‘agree customs backstop wording’


David Davis and Theresa May.

The UK’s proposed “backstop” plan for trade with the EU after Brexit has been published after an “expected” end date – of 2021 – was included in it.

It followed crunch meetings between Prime Minister Theresa May and Brexit Secretary David Davis, who insisted a cut-off date be included.

The proposal would see the UK match EU trade tariffs temporarily in order to avoid a hard Irish border post-Brexit.

Brexiteers want to ensure the backstop could not continue indefinitely.

Responding on Twitter, EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier set out the criteria on which he would judge the UK’s proposal, including the need for a “workable solution” to avoid a hard border in Northern Ireland.

The European Parliament’s Brexit co-ordinator Guy Verhofstadt went further, saying it was “difficult to see” how this could be achieved.

“A backstop that is temporary is not a backstop, unless the definitive arrangement is the same as the backstop,” he added.

  • Brexit: Key dates and potential flashpoints
  • Reality Check: The government’s customs options

The UK is due to leave the EU in March 2019, and the government is trying to make progress before a crucial meeting of EU leaders later this month.

BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg said Mr Davis had “pushed back very hard” against the proposals on Wednesday and had two meetings with the prime minister on Thursday before a deal was agreed.

After the publication, Mr Davis’s chief of staff said there had been a “helpful dialogue” and that the document had now been “clarified and amended”.

According to the document – which has yet to be agreed with the EU – the “temporary customs arrangement”, if it is needed, would be “time-limited”.

A long-term “future customs arrangement” will be in place “by the end of December 2021 at the latest”, it says.

Who’s the real winner?

David Davis is the victor of the hour, it seems, writes BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg.

The Brexit secretary threatened to quit the government if the prime minister refused to change her proposal to fix the customs conundrum – after he demanded a time limit on the “backstop”, the insurance policy for avoiding a hard Irish border if trade talks break down.

There is a date in the document that is now on its way to Brussels.

Read the rest of Laura’s blog

Please upgrade your browser to view this content.

What is the customs ‘backstop’ issue?

The UK has said it will leave the EU’s customs union, which allows trade within the EU without any tariffs or many border checks.

The UK and the EU are yet to agree how trade in goods will operate after Brexit – but they have said that a “backstop” option is needed in case no deal is done, or the technology is not ready in time, to avoid the return of a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

The UK has said that the EU’s initial “backstop” proposal – effectively keeping Northern Ireland in the customs union – would create what amounted to a border between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK and was not acceptable.

Instead, the UK is proposing a backup plan which would see the whole of the UK temporarily aligned with the EU’s customs union after December 2020 – when the 21-month post-Brexit transition period ends.

The plan, which Theresa May has said would only apply in a “limited set of circumstances”, would see the UK match EU tariffs in order to avoid border checks.

  • Kuenssberg: Brakes slammed on customs plan
  • Corbyn likens Brexit to trains ‘shambles’

Please upgrade your browser

What are Brexiteers worried about?

Former Brexit minister David Jones explained why Eurosceptic MPs are concerned about the plans.

With the EU sceptical about the two options the UK has suggested to replace its membership of the customs union – and government ministers yet to agree which one to pursue – the backstop is “rapidly becoming the only option on the table”, he told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme – “so it must be got right”.

Mr Jones said the arrangement without a firm time limit would be “damaging to the country”.

“It would tie us effectively into the the EU’s customs arrangement for an indefinite period” he said, adding that “time-limited” and “indefinite” do not go together.

It would prevent the UK from having its own independent trade policy, he said – customs union members are not allowed to strike their own international trade deals.

It would also mean the UK was still under the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice, which would be unacceptable to most Conservative MPs, he added.

Asked about reports Mr Davis could resign over the row, Mr Jones said the Brexit secretary would be a “huge loss to the government”.

“I think that we need to make sure that David Davis stays at the negotiating table,” he added.

Brexiteer Iain Duncan Smith on David Davis’s position

The view from the EU

BBC Europe editor Katya Adler

“Wow,” gushed a European journalist to me the other day, “normally we look to Italy for political drama and uncertainty but the UK is making a pretty good show of it.”

So dizzying and confused is the news coming out of the UK about how the EU-UK relationship could and should work after Brexit, that EU negotiators say they are forced to stand on the sidelines while the British government talks and argues with itself.

“It just can’t work,” an EU diplomat told me in exasperation this week. “Theresa May has so many nooses dangling around her neck that one of those nooses is sure to hang her.”

He was talking about splits in the prime minister’s cabinet, the need to keep Northern Ireland’s unionist DUP on board, UK business demands, EU red lines and Brexit negotiating time running out.

“It could be the UK unintentionally crashing out of the EU with no deal simply because time runs out.”

Read Katya’s blog

BBC Brussels reporter Adam Fleming says the EU will apply a series of tests to any proposal about customs from the UK.

He lists them as: “Will it be temporary and what does it say about an end point? How far does it go to solve the issue of the Irish border? How does it interact with the EU’s own customs policy, for example when it comes to preventing fraud or dealing with imports of – say – subsidised Chinese steel that break international trade law?

“Does it require the EU to change its rules, and what happens when new ones are introduced? And what about product standards, something else that gets checked at the border along with customs.”